Login
IWC Portugieser Perpetual Calendar 42 - 18K 5N Gold Case - Silver-Plated Dial - IW344202
IWC Portugieser Perpetual Calendar 42 - 18K 5N Gold Case - Silver-Plated Dial - IW344202
IWC Portugieser Perpetual Calendar 42 - 18K 5N Gold Case - Silver-Plated Dial - IW344202
 Next

IWC Portugieser Perpetual Calendar 42 - 18K 5N Gold Case - Silver-Plated Dial - IW344202

Marsoni M251S
Sale price$13982.50
Pay 4 payments of $3495.62 a month.Shop Pay
Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29
IWC Portugieser Perpetual Calendar 42 - 18K 5N Gold Case - Silver-Plated Dial - IW34420242. 4mm 18K 5N gold case, 13. 8mm thick, see through sapphire glass back, convex sapphire glass crystal with antireflective coating on both sides, silver plated dial, calibre 82650 automatic movement with hours, minutes, small seconds, approximately 60 hours of power reserve. Water resistant to 3 bar.
Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your IWC Portugieser Perpetual Calendar 42 - 18K 5N Gold Case - Silver-Plated Dial - IW344202 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

  • Standard: 3-7 business days
  • Fast: 2-3 business days
  • Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your IWC Portugieser Perpetual Calendar 42 - 18K 5N Gold Case - Silver-Plated Dial - IW344202 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about IWC Portugieser Perpetual Calendar 42 - 18K 5N Gold Case - Silver-Plated Dial - IW344202, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for IWC Portugieser Perpetual Calendar 42 - 18K 5N Gold Case - Silver-Plated Dial - IW344202 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 2352 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
C
Verified Purchase
Consumer Reports
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Fit great
Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Halo Gray
Been a couple of months and they seem to be holding up nicely. Real picky about fit of socks and these fit well. They are very thin but very comfortable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2024
B
Verified Purchase
Broussard Household.
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
Always a win
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Under armor is always a win! Comfortable, no peeling, true to size, no squeezing around the arch of foot & affordable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
tab
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 4
Fit well and stay up
Size: Large, Color: (299) City Khaki / City Khaki / White
They're a little thin, so good mainly for warmer months. But they fit very well and I've not experienced any slippage
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 17, 2026
G
Verified Purchase
Gustavo Garcia
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
Llego a tiempo
Size: X-Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Bien
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026
V
Verified Purchase
ViperMageEx
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 3
Low quality socks.
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
I have been buying Under Armour undergarments for years and have noticed a steady decline in quality. These socks are no different. I purchased another six packs of very similar styled Under Armour socks in 2023 and recently they have started wearing out. Those socks are no longer available for reorder, but these extremely similar socks were so I ordered them. The quality difference is obvious just by looking at and feeling them. They are more of a faded black/brown than the black pictured or the black that the three year old socks still are. The material is completely different and feels lighter. When wearing them they already feel like they are bunching up in my shoes, which the old ones never did. I do not expect these to last even a year and will not buy them again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2026

recommand products

NORTHERN SCOTLAND. by ANDREW JOHNSTON from Camden's Britannia 1772 old map
NORTHERN SCOTLAND. by ANDREW JOHNSTON from Camden's Britannia 1772 old map
108.95
 LONDON. Richmond Park, East Sheen, Mortlake, North Sheen, Roehampton 1928 map
LONDON. Richmond Park, East Sheen, Mortlake, North Sheen, Roehampton 1928 map
40.00
 LONDON. Canning Town,Stratford,West Ham,Plaistow,Blackwall,Poplar 1928 old map
LONDON. Canning Town,Stratford,West Ham,Plaistow,Blackwall,Poplar 1928 old map
28.00
 HERTS.Busheyheath,Caldecote Hill,Clay Hill,Little Bushey,Stanmore Cmn 1928 map
HERTS.Busheyheath,Caldecote Hill,Clay Hill,Little Bushey,Stanmore Cmn 1928 map
17.95
 LONDON. Bermondsey, Peckham, Rotherhithe, Wapping, Surrey Docks 1928 old map
LONDON. Bermondsey, Peckham, Rotherhithe, Wapping, Surrey Docks 1928 old map
47.00