


KTM 60112078000 REAR LUGGAGE BAG
Marsoni
M251S
Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping.
Friday, May 29
KTM 60112078000 REAR LUGGAGE BAGKTM 60112078000 REAR BAG Luggage bag Completely waterproof and flexible in size! The ideal solution for all those wanting to go on long or short tours from time to time. Description Model Year 690 Duke 2008 2008 790 Adventure 2019 2019 990 Adventure 2007 2007 1290 Super Adventure T 2017 2017 1290 SUPER DUKE GT 2018 2018 950 Supermoto R 2007 2007 640 Adventure 2007 2007 990 Adventure 2010 2010 990 Supermoto R 2010 2010 690 Enduro R 2011 2011 690 Duke
Quick Dispatch:
Your KTM 60112078000 REAR LUGGAGE BAG orders ship within 1-2 business days.
Delivery Options:
- Standard: 3-7 business days
- Fast: 2-3 business days
- Express: 1-2 business days
Order Tracking:
You'll receive a tracking link by email once your KTM 60112078000 REAR LUGGAGE BAG ships.
Need Help?
Questions about KTM 60112078000 REAR LUGGAGE BAG, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.
Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for KTM 60112078000 REAR LUGGAGE BAG in your area.
Get Shipping Estimates
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
You may also like
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 1310 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Very good product
Size: Medium, Color: (001) Black / Black / Pitch Gray
I purchased these to wear inside lowcut slip on casual shoes, I don't particularly like to not wear socks in my shoes for hygienic reasons. Prior to purchasing these socks, all I could find were those made of very light beige hosiery type material , and my slip on shoes would slide around a bit. These are light weight and breathable athletic type material, with a very good gripper strip at the heel. One pair of my slip on casual shoes have a particularly lower cut in the toe area, but the shoe is black and I chose the black color and though I see a hint of the sock there, it matches and does not detract from the look of the casual solid black shoe
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2026
★★★★★ 5
They stay out! No more sock wads!
Size: Medium, Color: (100) White / White / Mod Gray
Best no show socks ever made!!!!! I've been struggling for 2 years to find ones that actually stay on your foot, even other national brands, and I just became content wearing my sneakers without socks. They ALWAYS slid down into my show & I ended up walking on a wad of sock until I could fix it...or usually just took them off after a couple of tries. Enter Under Armor!!! They a mid weight, but not very thick & still breathable. They work too by actually staying on your foot! Not once have they slid down into my show!! Very comfortable but they could be a little more affordable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 1, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Love!
Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Mod Gray
Ive tried so many no show socks but I love these. This is the 3rd set I've bought. They never slip off and the material is thin and breathable. Perfect for working out.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2026
★★★★★ 5
True no-show socks that don’t slide down!
Size: Medium, Color: (100) White / White / Mod Gray, Size: Medium, Color: (100) White / White / Mod Gray
This is the first pair of no-show socks I’ve tried that actually don’t slide down into my shoes. Trust me… I have tried lots of different pairs and this is the one! They fit perfectly. They’re not too thick and they’re obviously durable because I wash them after each wear, so daily.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 21, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Great fit but expensive
Size: Medium, Color: (252) Blush Beige / White / Castlerock
These are really great socks. I love them, but they are definitely pricey.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2026